A series of Q&As with selected speakers ahead of their appearance at Travolution Connects, the new event from Eventiz from Travelsoft…
Casper Maasdam is the managing director of Europe operations for trip.com, also holding the role of CEO for Travix, one of trip.com’s European brands. In this Q&A he compares and contrasts the travel patterns and technology preferences between European and APAC markets.
Are there any material differences between the travel trends you are seeing in Europe and APAC
The bigger consumer needs are broadly consistent - value, convenience, transparency, personalisation support. The difference is how those needs show up across regions.
In many APAC markets, the travel journey is often more mobile-led and more integrated across search, booking, payment, content, loyalty and service. That can make adoption of new tools faster when those tools are connected to real services and practical journey moments.
Europe is generally more fragmented. Travellers often compare across multiple platforms and suppliers before booking, so trust plays a particularly important role. Price competitiveness matters, but so do clarity, transparent policies, reliable after-sales support and confidence that help is available if something goes wrong.
APAC was seen as a driving force in the mainstreaming of mobile. Is a similar dynamic happening with AI, and are there learnings for Europe-Asia travel?
There is a parallel, but the learning is broader than AI.
APAC helped mainstream mobile because mobile became connected to the full travel journey. The same dynamic is starting to happen with AI, although it’s only the start, but we’re making progress, particularly around how AI will be part of booking and payment.
But it’s true that travellers adopt new technology faster when it helps them complete real tasks more easily than the existing options. Simply adding another interface does not drive adoption.
For Europe-Asia travel, this is particularly relevant because long-haul travel involves more uncertainty -flight options, baggage rules, entry requirements, payment methods, local transport, language barriers, hotel location and disruption support. In these examples, the value of technology is not just inspiration; it is information and reassurance.
AI supports this, but only when it is connected to real travel systems. A chatbot that sounds helpful is not enough, its responses have to be accurate and trustworthy. We see an opportunity to position AI as a decision and service layer: helping the traveller understand, compare, decide and act with confidence.
From a Trip.com perspective, how much do you need to regionalise products and experiences for Europe-Asia travellers?
Localisation is essential, but it is not just translation. The underlying platform can be global, but the customer experience needs to reflect where the traveller is from, where they are going, and what kind of uncertainty they are trying to solve.
Across APAC source markets, behaviour is not uniform. In some markets, travellers may use digital tools as their real-time decision partners during the trip. In others, the value is more about certainty before departure: planning earlier, comparing more carefully and seeking detailed reassurance before committing.
For European travelers heading to Asia, the experience needs to be adapted to different levels of familiarity with Asia, different booking windows, different expectations around support and different comfort levels with digital tools.
Travellers using digital tools not only for inspiration but also for reassurance is one of the clearest behavioural shifts that we’ve seen across all markets - when someone is travelling long-haul, responses can inspire (or undermine) the confidence which encourages (or dissuades) a traveler to move towards booking.
Our goal is one global foundation that can adapt to local behaviours and traveller confidence needs.
_w=728_h=90_pjpg.jpg?v=20230522122229)